Moving From Church Models to Christ’s Model

April 2018 Blog Theme: The Bold Moves of Disciple Making

Church leaders love models.

Pastors seem to be naturally drawn to the latest and greatest trends in ministry. Over the past twenty years, I’ve seen models come and go. I can remember when “Flake’s formula” was the rage for growing Sunday Schools in Baptist churches.

Arthur Flake was a department store salesman from Winona, Mississippi, who began to volunteer in his local church and developed a strategy for growing groups. Although he never attended seminary or pastored a church, Flake became the first Director for Sunday School for Southern Baptists in 1920, and his five-point formula influenced churches all across North America and the Pacific. This was the model I was taught in seminary. After Flake came bus ministry. Walter Stuart Beebe was running a gas station in southern Florida when a young lady gave him a Gospel tract.

He later came to faith in Christ and became a pastor. But he was best known as “Mr. Bus” because he began the bus ministry movement in the early 70s that spread like wildfire across the country. Churches would rent or buy a fleet of buses and bring kids to church. Beebe directed some of the largest bus ministries in the nation from Florida to Indiana, including Jerry Falwell’s church in Lynchburg, Virginia. In the 1980s came the “attractional model” that focused on seeker-sensitive worship experiences designed to attract the unchurched. Willow Creek and Saddleback were the trail blazers of that movement.

In the early 90s, the Pentecostal minister, Carl George popularized the “meta church model,” emphasizing not large gatherings, but intimate, small home groups he called cells. By the late 1990s to the early 2000s a new trend was developing called “missional communities.” This model originated with St. Thomas’ Crookes Church in Sheffield, England and proposed that churches should not concentrate on large attractive worship services or small home groups, but should instead serve the needs of the community. Early adapters promoted “random acts of kindness” and “social justice” as a means to evangelism and church growth.

In early 2000, bloggers Frank Viola and Neil Cole promoted the “organic church model,” defining church as a rapidly reproducing gathering of three to twenty people with little structure or organizational leadership. In the last ten years, the “multi-site model” has become increasingly popular. It was pioneered by Larry Osborne, Greg Ferguson, and Craig Groeschel.

In 1990 there were only ten multi-site churches in America, but by 2012 there were over five thousand churches using this model. The fastest growing churches in America are using a multi-site strategy. Today, a whole new language circulates on church blogs and conferences using terms like “radical,” “relational,” “tribal,” “fundamental,” “emergent,” “reformed,” “egalitarian,” “complementarian,” “cessationist,” “charismatic,” and on it goes. I’m sitting here with a book on my desk that urges pastors to “identify their tribe” and find their model. When I get around certain groups of pastors, they are quick to show their tribal label and they want to see mine. Church conferences are all about promoting the latest models and tribes.

Megachurch pastors take the stage like rock stars and talk about how many thousands of people attend their services and how many followers they have on Twitter. All the while, the pastor in the seat, slugging it out in a struggling church, has two options: either he can leave discouraged (“I’ll never be as successful or as cool as he is. I guess I’m a failure.”) or leave envious (“I want what he’s got. I want to be just like him. I’ll mimic him so maybe I can be successful, too.”) Either option is bad. In the meantime, the church at large is shrinking.

Now don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying that church models or tribal distinctives are bad. In fact, each of the models I’ve mentioned has been used by God to advance the church and to reach people. I’m thankful for each of them. Additionally, throughout history the church has always adapted and morphed into various shapes and models—sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse. The church has always been tribal, dividing and gathering along the lines of theology and practice. That’s not my concern. My concern is that somewhere in all the current dialogue about models, tribes, and trends, the model of Jesus is getting lost.

Written by Craig Etheredge

This blog is an excerpt that comes from our book Bold Moves which you can purchase here.

Photo by Helloquence on Unsplash


Other Articles You Might Like

Is Fear Holding You Back?

Fear can hold you back, but the Spirit can make you bold. Probably the biggest excuse that keeps us...

Are You Listening to God’s Voice?

You were created to know God in a deep and personal way. He never intended for your relationship...

God’s Love Language

In 1992, a book was published that took off like wildfire. To date, it has sold more than 10...

The Center of Your Heart

First Steps in Your Disciple-Making Journey Among the ruins of ancient Rome sits a small dungeon...

4 thoughts on “Moving From Church Models to Christ’s Model

  1. Well put sir and thanks for laying out the history of the various models. I remember all of these and at times the resurgence of them (like it was something new!). I do agree that in all of these that sometimes the model of jesus is lost or a particular method of jesus is focus on alone.

    During a discipleship training session a few years back it seemed the lord dropped wisdom/clarity into my head and I wrote this down:

    “Everyone is looking for the ‘silver bullet’ (the perfect plan, method or processes), but there isn’t one. It all starts with a ‘full’ surrender to jesus on this journey.”

    A key to what you said is following the lead of the holy spirit. We can see in scripture when this was done (David and the philistines in 2 Samuel 5). Same results but God had him do it differently each time. And when it wasn’t as with Joshua with attempting to take Ai and basing the initial plan on the success at Jericho and not checking with god. Jesus only did what the father directed. Jesus is the architect and foreman of building his church. we are the workman and need to follow his lead. now even some will take this to an extreme and not do anything in every situation unless god directs. (I can’t do CPR because god didn’t answer me yet). Micah 6:8 – Act justly, love/show mercy and walk humbly with your god – deny yourself, pick up your cross and ‘follow’ me.

    1. Thank you for your comments!

  2. I loved this blog! You are so right. We get so caught up in our terms and our models that we forget to model Jesus. Models are not wrong or bad, but let’s do things right and focus on Him first.

    1. Thank you for your comment, Pastor!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Receive weekly emails about our latest blog posts, events and more!